Many
people who are involved in a Change in some shape or form go through a
transition curve and can relate their experience to the following figure – This
does not have to be a change or transformation programme at work although the
curve can be easily absorbed in corporate world.
Take a minute or two to study the transition curve if you
are not familiar with the curve.
Now
to the question what does this transition curve have in common to Dark Knight Rises?
The connection goes in two parts:
Part 1.
How does change happen in an organisation? What
happens to leadership?
Part 2.
Is Leadership during change really a super-hero
effort?
I am
going to answer both these parts and whenever possible, I will try to compare
and contrast the scenes from Dark Knight Rises movie (Apologies to those who
have not watched the movie – It is a must watch in my opinion).
Part 1: How does change happen in an organisation?
What happens to leadership?
Who
are our leaders in the organisation? There is so much emphasis put on
leadership, their vision & values for change. No doubts – They are all
important. But all set and done, leaders are also people and so they also
follow a similar transition curve as mentioned above. But there is a difference
– Change leadership go through the transition curve before the rest of the
organisation experiences the same. i.e. for example, they hit the depression
mode by the time others feel shocked about the change. Pretty bold statement
from my side, but there is a lot of truth. Have a private 1-1 conversation,
they will probably agree. The following diagram represents the curve that both
leadership and the rest of the organisation go through.
Let
us compare this to Dark Knight Rises - This is similar to how Batman gets into
denial mode when he believes that he can take on the villain Bane by himself
but gets defeated first time around while the rest of Gotham experiences shock
phase subsequently during the American football match. It does not stop there.
Batman goes to the depression stage but he continues to build up in that dark
cell and comes back with renewed energy again before the rest of the city.
Theoretically,
the transition/change curve of leadership and the rest of the organisation go
in parallel (as shown above) but in the real life, there are two factors that
play a big role:
- The Depth of the curve: Over the course of change, the highs and especially the lows might and will vary for the leadership and the rest of the organisation. However, what is important is that the leadership curve stays ahead otherwise; the rest of the organisation will start to have its own doubts.
- The road to recovery:
The most sensitive part of the change curve is the depression stage. This is where the positive forces of change should tip over the negative forces. Many of the change programmes falter at this point and impact of such failure affect the future change programmes as well.
Part 2: Is Leadership
during change really a super-hero effort?
Yes
and No. Yes, you need a strong sponsor to run the whole change show. No,
because gone are the days of one person championing the whole organisational
change. There needs to be involvement from multiple people to support the whole
change. Again, this is similar to how Batman defeats Bane. Even though Batman
was a single person, he did not do it all by himself. He had allies – Gordon (the
commissioner), Blake (the detective), Selina (Kind of cat woman) and an army of
cops.
Not
only the allies (read Stakeholders) are needed, they need to sustain throughout
the course of the change. Consider the following dialogue from Bane (the
villain):
“It doesn't matter who we are... what matters is our plan....”
With
“Plan, Plan and more plan” strategy, we are walking a tighter rope and hence there
is a chance of losing people deliberately or due to circumstances. Just like
how Bane kept losing some of this ally during the course of the movie. People
work for people and not because there is a plan to follow.
That
is why it becomes important that the change leadership style change in order to
cater to different phases and needs of the people undergoing transition.
Up
till this point, we are considering that the change curve has different stages
and both leadership & the rest of the organisation goes through this stage linearly.
Generally, that is not the case. Most of the change programme that I have seen,
heard or read has an “Oscillation effect” at some point of time or even at time
during multiple phases of change.
“What is an Oscillation Effort?” Let us look at an example
of that during the depression stage.
It is normal and expected to feel pronounced level of fear, anxiousness and insecurity during an oscillation effect. This is where the leadership and vision does matter. And, if enough attention is not paid to this situation, the performance will go down drastically and a pessimistic feeling can spread within the corporate culture. This is where the communication is very important. Just like how Batman conveys to Gotham with the bat shaped fire on one of the Gotham’s sky scrapers informing that the Dark Knight is back for rescue and to lead Gotham towards safety.
But again,
Dark knight was not alone. Remember, he had his allies which prove to stronger
at the end. So change is not a one man show. Here is the summary:
- Organisation and Leadership both go through a transition curve
- Leadership through transition need to take different style and approach
- Transition curve is not linear and there can (will) be bumps along the road
Finally,
I leave you with one applicable quote for change from Dark Knight Rises:
“A hero can be anyone. Even a man doing
something as simple and reassuring as putting a coat around a little boy's
shoulder to let him know that the world hadn't ended.”
2 comments:
I haven't seen the movie but will offer the following comments. In your second graph, I agree that leadership go through the same pattern of emotions but depending on the type of change, the cycle may be much shorter (especially if the change is directed). It may also be useful in that same graph to make the difference between middle management and top leadership curves. Finally, assuming that the first curve is meant to be the top leadership, I would submit that the employee curve will begin much later on the time horizon as change trickles down the organization. It may be even difficult for top leadership to understand why employees feel that way because top leadership has forgotten the emotions it went through and, that they are already looking forward for the next change in their strategic role.
@Jean: Very valid points.
I have seen how at times that Leadership sometimes cannot understand the emotions that employees feel. And in a way, it is related to other point that you mentioned.
Leadership, at times, go through a shorter cycle and so cannot relate why their employees are struggling.
Post a Comment